Talk:Picross 3D

I do have a general article question: Do you guys reference statements in articles? I haven't seen it done on any of the pages I've viewed here, which I'll admit has been a small sample. Example of Article Referencing at WiKirby This isn't the absolute best example, just the first I grabbed. Axiomist 01:29, 29 May 2010 (MDT)

Honestly, we have not truly done citations on the site aside from the occasional website. I guess it's kinda the remainder of the casual style we used in the beginning. I believe we can implement such things in the future, but it would take a while to go through all the articles to do so, and I feel like there's a limit to the things that truly need citations. For internet sources such as interviews and official website info, definitely. But stuff such as basic gameplay info seems self-explanatory. Oddly enough, I notice that even Bulbapedia doesn't have such references/citations. I guess this stuff would probably be Masa's call in the end.

GORE-ILLA 13:34, 29 May 2010 (MDT)

Understood. I see 3 tiers to citations

• Ultra Citationist= Sources as many points as possible to manuals, ingame text, guides, developer quotes, and internet content on the subject.
• Moderate Citationist= Sources only points of contention, or statements that aren't immediately evident to be true.
• Non-Citationism= Nothing is referenced at all.

Of course, I'm not pushing any philosophy here, personally I'm in the top group. But if I were to recommend any it'd be the second. Another matter entirely, I was browsing through the portals, and noticed there wasn't anything for Picross. Being a rather minor series, if one at all, I propose a more general portal/category for puzzle games which would include Brain Age and Big Brain Academy. Axiomist 13:59, 29 May 2010 (MDT)