Editing Talk:MissingNo.

Oh God no, a glitch as a Pokémon? No way. I vote for deletion. [[User:Smash Brother|Smash Brother]] 22:30, 30 October 2007 (MDT)
:I think it might be worth keeping (providing we actually fill it out). Even Bulbapedia has it listed with a Pokemon template... though I think we should take it out of the extra superfluous categories like "Normal Type" and "Bird Type". I think what we really need to vote on is whether or not we should put it down as evolving into [[Kangaskhan]]. - [[User:Masamune|Masamune]] 22:45, 30 October 2007 (MDT)
::But it's just a code error, then what about all the other glitches in  Pokémon and all the little glitches in every other game? Is glitch city a city? Is that really trustfull info or gives anything about the game other than the fact that it appears by accident? [[User:Smash Brother|Smash Brother]] 22:50, 30 October 2007 (MDT)

Despite being a glitch, MissingNo. is a genuine, catchable and usable Pokemon that doesn't even require a hacking device to find.  It has unique stats and movesets.  It's also somewhat infamous as far as glitches go.
Latest revision		Your text
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Despite being a glitch, MissingNo. is a genuine, catchable and usable Pokemon that doesn't even require a hacking device to find. It has unique stats and movesets. It's also somewhat infamous as far as glitches go.		Despite being a glitch, MissingNo. is a genuine, catchable and usable Pokemon that doesn't even require a hacking device to find. It has unique stats and movesets. It's also somewhat infamous as far as glitches go.
−
−	Yes, like most catchable Pokémon that also mess the graphics of the game. It was just a placeholder for info inside the catr. If Masamune wanted to do the categories based on the automatic infobox this screws all because we will have at least 5 ??? categories for just a glitch. [[User:Smash Brother\|Smash Brother]] 23:05, 30 October 2007 (MDT)